Popular rule instead of supranationalism - leave the EU
- Swedish citizens should not be governed by supranational agendas.
Sweden's future should be decided by Swedish citizens, not by unelected networks, supranational bodies or by remote control from Brussels, Geneva and Davos.
We say yes to the benefits of globalisation - trade, knowledge exchange and travel. But we say no to globalism as an ideology. At the heart of globalisation is the shift of power away from the people to institutions we cannot vote out. As decisions are taken further and further away from our daily lives, our voices are silenced, freedom shrinks and national self-determination is eroded. Through communications and global trade, the world has become smaller, richer and more interconnected. This is the bright side of globalisation. But at the same time, another movement has emerged: globalism.
Globalism takes our freedom
Globalism sees the nation state as an obstacle and the voter as a formality. As an ideology, globalism puts four things first: cross-border governance, standardisation, technocratic problem-solving and weaker national sovereignty. It wants climate, health, migration, finance and digital infrastructure to be managed through supranational organisations (EU, UN, WHO, OECD, IMF, etc.) and through partnerships between public institutions and private corporations. In practice, decisions are made above the heads of voters. The nation is reduced to an implementing body; ”democracy” becomes implementing what has already been decided.
Increasingly, non-democratic organisations such as the WHO, OECD, IMF and various NetZero coalitions are influencing how Sweden is governed. The WHO is pushing to give itself global control over health policy in the event of the ”next pandemic”. The OECD opposes tax competition between countries and pushes for harmonisation so that everyone has a high tax burden. IMF monetary policy dogma has contributed time and again to high global inflation - stealing from you, your savings and your pension.
NetZero agendas (e.g. Agenda 2030) are another such lever for centralisation: binding targets, timelines and quotas shift decisions from our municipalities, businesses and households to supranational organisations. Energy, transport and agriculture are controlled from above with targets and bans that do not take Swedish conditions into account. The result is that competition between countries is stifled - lower taxes, cheaper energy and simpler rules are discouraged - while the cost is passed on to citizens.
Orders from above
What the globalising agencies have in common is that they are gradually taking away our right to govern ourselves. Once upon a time, the farmer was free to grow what he wanted. Today, his work is centrally planned in Soviet style via EU and UN climate targets. He is controlled by subsidies and penalties and can be monitored by satellite. Once we were free to trade, transfer money and express our opinions, but as power is centralised, politicians' ability to control and tax grows. Whoever controls your money, your identity and your freedom of movement - they control you.
One of the most influential private globalisers is the World Economic Forum (WEF). Its members are the world's largest multinational corporations and other so-called ”stakeholders”. The WEF promotes the idea of a new global world order with a self-appointed leadership given far-reaching economic and legal powers. In practice, this agenda means less influence for nations and more control via mass digital surveillance, individual control systems, carbon-based points, censorship of free speech and programmable digital currencies - CBDCs.
Digital coercive society
Digitalisation has enabled surveillance and governance on a scale never seen before. The EU, UN and WEF are pushing for the creation of global digital identities that make people ”global citizens” without strong ties to their nation. Such systems will make it possible to track travel, vaccine status, purchases, carbon footprints and online communications. Linked to programmable central bank currencies, individuals' purchases can be recorded and restricted based on political objectives or social scores - always under the pretext of increasing safety and security. Sweden is often at the forefront of technological innovation without considering the privacy risks to citizens. Authorities are given digitalisation targets, but the state should work on behalf of the nation, not the other way around. The question is therefore simple: who should actually register and scrutinise whom?
Swedish politicians need to speak clearly about two keys to the control society: the EU's digital identity wallet and central bank digital currencies.
Central bank digital currencies (CBDC)
CBDCs, such as the e-krona or the digital euro, are marketed as modern and inclusive. In reality, they are traceable and programmable ”money” suitable for economic management by the individual. With CBDCs, it is possible to impose negative interest rates, expiry dates after which your money burns out, and purchase conditions and/or purchase bans for certain goods or in certain locations. This means that the state may be able to mould down to the smallest receipt. A technical glitch or a political decision in a centralised system can lock, ration or redirect payment flows in real time. Such a concentration of power has no place in a democracy. We demand that cash is protected by the constitution, that the diversity of means of payment is safeguarded and that neither the e-krona nor the digital euro is introduced for the general public. The bank account must not become the state's remote control.
Digital ID wallet
The EU eIDA framework and the planned EU Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet) are being promoted as seamless and simple. ID, driving licence, grades, tickets, signatures, medical certificates - all in the same wallet. Convenient? Yes, it is. Dangerous? Also yes. Linking identity, permissions and everyday services into one tool creates the perfect infrastructure for conditional access, tracking and behavioural management. ”Voluntariness” quickly becomes false if governments, banks and businesses effectively demand your wallet.
Ambition Sverige's line is crystal clear: identity should identify - not control. The ID wallet must never become a condition for participation in society. The right to an analogue life is central. All centralised surveillance of individuals' lives must be banned.
If CBDCs and personalised carbon credits are linked to the ID wallet, it becomes the hub for both identity and money. The ID wallet becomes the perfect management tool: with CBDC and personalised carbon credits, your purchases can be tracked in real time (amount, store, location), your carbon quota is automatically recorded, and blocks can be set - from geofencing to stopping purchases on the ’wrong’ goods - all linked to your personal ID.
Supranational governance
In 2019, the WEF partnered with the UN to accelerate the 2030 Agenda - a scheme that prioritises billionaires and checklists over popular governance. Swedish governments have followed suit. We are reversing this course: Sweden will not subordinate itself to the 2030 Agenda, the UN Pact for the Future or the Global Digital Compact. We say no to the WHO pandemic treaty, binding IHR changes and participation in the WHO Digital Health Certificate Network.
We want a Sweden that exists for its citizens. The state should serve the people - not control them. Farmers should be allowed to grow and produce, not fill in reports. Companies should grow through free competition, not through supranational checklists and control. Our money should not be programmed against us and our IDs should not become tools of control. Laws should be made in the Swedish parliament - by elected representatives who can be voted out.
Ambition Sverige will work for:
- Moving away from the 2030 Agenda as the guiding framework, as well as the UN Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact; reclaiming national targets and budget governance.
- Saying no to the WHO pandemic treaty and binding IHR changes; leaving the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network.
- Stopping the ekrona and rejecting digital euro for the public; constitutional protection of cash and diversity in payments.
- Say no to EUDI as a condition for civic participation; reject SOU 2023:61 and ban centralised logging of everyday use.
- Rejecting SOU 2023:22 and all general access to electronic communications; defending strong encryption and privacy.
- Reduce state media subsidies that favour agenda-driven giants; safeguard freedom of expression and pluralism.
- Pulling the handbrake on DSA, EU Digital Travel Identity and WHO GDHC/GDHCN; no permanent digital access systems in Sweden.